Evidensbasert praksis: Utvalgte kontroverser
Abstract
Evidensbasert praksis (EBP) er en stor tematikk med forgreninger i mange retninger, for eksempel epistemologi, metode, normativitet, kausalitet, rom for skjønn, forskningens rolle overfor praksis, etc. Ikke overraskende er uenigheten stor. I denne artikkelen diskuterer jeg fire utvalgte kontroverser: Hva «basert» betyr, evidensbegrepet, instrumentalitet og standardisering av praksis. Det finnes naturligvis flere kontroverser, men nettopp i disse er det mange misforståelser ute og går. Artikkelen er tenkt å bidra til oppklaring av ulike misforståelser, men også til nødvendig nyansering og tvisyn om EBP.
English abstract
Evidence-based practice (EBP) comprises a multitude of topics and has many ramifications, including epistemological, methodological, normative and ontological ones. Not surprisingly disagreement reigns. In this article I discuss four selected controversies: What “based” might mean, the concept of evidence, instrumentality, and the standardization of practice. These four are selected because they, as I see it, are the home of many misunderstandings. This article aims to help clarify matters, and to contribute to more nuanced discussions about EBP.
Authors contributing to The Nordic Journal of Pedagogy and Critique retain the copyright of their article but agree to publish their articles under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially, under the condition that appropriate credit is given, that a link to the license is provided, and that you indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
